Some YouTube channel data aggregation sites have confirmed a phenomenon in which the number of video views was recorded on the channel of former VTuber Uruha Rushia (0 video archives).
Please check not only this article, but also the primary information provided by the celebrities themselves, their agencies, groups, and companies, and fact-check the information. If you find any malicious or slanderous information, please report it to the contact person of each company.
Some so-called “Roundup Blogs” have published articles that slander and defame the celebrities, agencies, groups, and companies, and incite viewers and readers.
This time, this phenomenon was confirmed on the page related to Uruha Rushia’s channel on “yutura,” a website that distributes YouTuber talents channel data and gossip-related news, where “7,376 Views” were recorded on June 29, 2023 (while the number of video archives is 0) on June 29, 2023.
Image Credit: yutura
© Omoshiro Inc.
On the other hand, data aggregation sites other than YouTube do not record the number of views in this manner. As an example, PLAYBOARD shows “7,376” in the total number of views in the header top, while the number of views in the graph is recorded as 0.
Image Credit: PLAYBOARD
© 2023 DIFF., Inc.
It has been confirmed that other data aggregation sites show almost the same trend.
Given these circumstances, it is possible that this phenomenon is a glitch on the part of YouTube, but it is difficult to determine the cause at this time.
Slander and Defamation such as “Fabrication of Datas” are Found on Some Roundup Blogs
Uruha Rushia was terminated from VTuber agency hololive Productions on February 24, 2022, and her channel was also closed on March 31, with all video archives deleted.
Furthermore, the channel has since been excluded from the financial statements of COVER Corporation, which operates the agency, and continues to this day. Therefore, we do not see any particular merit or possibility for the company to attempt to increase the number of views of her channel at this time.
On the other hand, some so-called “Roundup Blogs” have been reporting that the company has padded the figures of the channels of the talents affiliating to the company, which may be considered slander and libel against the company and the agency.
It goes without saying that such posts suggesting that the agency or the company may be manipulating the information may constitute malicious libel or slander.
We would like to ask you again to check not only this article but also the primary information provided by the talent himself / herself, his / her agency, group, or company, and if you see any malicious information or slander, please report it to the contact above.